The unconstitutionality of the provisional execution of the penalty for condemnation in the fi rst instance executed by the jury court

Authors

  • Tiago Alves Teixeira Escola Brasileira de Direito (EBRADI) Author
  • Rita Carneiro Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia (UESB) Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v2i2.417

Keywords:

Provisional execution of sentence, Jury court, Unconstitutionality, nciple of the presumption of innocence, Art. 492, I, “e”, of the Anti-Crime Package

Abstract

This article aims to demonstrate the unconstitutionality of the rule contained in the second part of art. 492, I, “e”, of Law No. 13.964/2019, in which the provisional execution of the sentence is signed after the conviction in the Jury Court for sentences equal to or greater than 15 (fi fteen) years of imprisonment. The problem revolves around the violation of fundamental rights and guarantees established in the Magna Carta and the international treaties to which Brazil is a signatory, as well as the legal uncertainty promoted by the change in the understanding on the subject by the Supreme Court. The research was developed in an exploratory mode, with a bibliographic and jurisprudential survey. In the end, we seek to verify what measures can be adopted to solve the problem of unconstitutionality in the norm in question.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-01-22

How to Cite

TEIXEIRA, Tiago Alves; CARNEIRO, Rita. The unconstitutionality of the provisional execution of the penalty for condemnation in the fi rst instance executed by the jury court. Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal The Knowledge, Brasil, v. 2, n. 2, p. 411–418, 2024. DOI: 10.51473/rcmos.v2i2.417. Disponível em: https://submissoesrevistacientificaosaber.com/index.php/rcmos/article/view/314.. Acesso em: 23 dec. 2024.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 187

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.