Use of teaching resources in pedagogical interventions for neurodivergent students
Use of teaching resources in pedagogical interventions for neurodivergent students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2025.854Keywords:
Neurodiversity, Didactic resources, Inclusive education, Gamification, Assistive technologies.Abstract
This article presents a literature review on the use of didactic resources in pedagogical interventions aimed at neurodivergent students, such as those with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and dyslexia. The analysis of the studies reveals that adapted didactic resources, including visual materials, assistive technologies, and gamification strategies, play a crucial role in facilitating learning and promoting the inclusion of these students in educational settings. However, the effectiveness of these interventions depends on factors such as continuous teacher training, institutional support, and the adequacy of technological infrastructure. Additionally, the review identifies gaps in the literature, highlighting the need for longitudinal studies and more rigorous methodologies to evaluate the long-term impacts of these interventions. The practical and policy implications suggest that effective inclusive education requires an institutional commitment to teacher training, the provision of adequate infrastructure, and the promotion of digital inclusion. This study offers a theoretical and practical foundation for the development of pedagogical strategies that recognize and value neurodiversity.
Downloads
References
BOOTH, Andrew; SUTTON, Anthea; PAPAIOANNOU, Diana. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. London: SAGE Publications, 2016.
BOSSAERT, G.; COLPIN, H.; PIJL, Sip Jan; PETRY, Katja. Truly included? A literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, v. 17, n. 1, p. 60-79, jun. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2011.580464
BRAUN, Virginia; CLARKE, Victoria. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, v. 3, n. 2, p. 77-101, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
COOPER, Harris; HEDGES, Larry V.; VALENTINE, Jeffrey C. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. 2. ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2019.
GEE, J. Paul. What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595
HIGGINS, Julian; THOMAS, James; CHANDLER, Jacqueline; CUMPSTON, Miranda; LI, Tianjing; PAGE, Matthew; WELCH, Vivian. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane, 2023. Disponível em https://training.cochrane.org/handbook. Acesso em 25 fev. 2024.
KITCHENHAM, Barbara. Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University, 2004. Disponível em https://www.inf.ufsc.br/~aldo.vw/kitchenham.pdf. Acesso em 24 mar. 2024.
MANTOAN, Maria Teresa Eglér. Inclusão escolar: O que é? Por quê? Como fazer? São Paulo: Moderna, 2003.
MEYER, A.; ROSE, D. H.; GORDON, D. Universal design for learning: Theory and Practice. Wakefield, MA: CAST Professional Publishing, 2014.
MODESTO, Mônica Andrade; ARAÚJO, Isabela Rosália Lima de; MENDONÇA, Ana Cláudia Sousa. Desafios e possibilidades para a implementação de uma educação especial e inclusiva na rede estadual de ensino de Sergipe. Revista Brasileira de Educação Especial, v. 29, n. 2, p. 243-260, dez. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-54702023v29e0234
MOHER, David; LIBERATI, Alessandro; TETZLAFF, Jennifer; ALTMAN, Douglas G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Open Medicine, v. 3, n. 2, p. 123-130, 2009.
PETTICREW, Mark; ROBERTS, Helen. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. USA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. Disponível em https://fcsalud.ua.es/en/portal-de-investigacion/documentos/tools-for-the-bibliographic-research/guide-of-systematic-reviews-in-social-sciences.pdf. Acesso em 20 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
POPAY, Jennie; ROGERS, Anne; WILLIAMS, Gareth. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research, v. 8, n. 3, p. 341-351, mai. 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800305
RENZULLI, Joseph. The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A comprehensive plan for the development of talents and giftedness. Revista Educação Especial, v. 27, n. 50, p. 539-562, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/1984686X14285
ROSE, David H.; MEYER, Anne; HITCHCOCK, Chuck. The Universally Designed Classroom: Accessible Curriculum and Digital Technologies. Harvard Education Press, 2005.
SCHINATO, L. C. Siqueira; STRIEDER, D. M. Ensino de Ciências na Perspectiva da Educação Inclusiva: A Importância dos Recursos Didáticos Adaptados na Prática Pedagógica. Revista Temas em Educação, [S. l.], v. 29, n. 2, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2359-7003.2020v29n2.43584
SQUIRE, Kurt. Video Games and Learning: Teaching and Participatory Culture in the Digital Age. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 2011.
SWANSON, H. Lee; HARRIS, Karen R.; GRAHAM, Steve. Handbook of Learning Disabilities. 2. ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 2014.
VYGOTSKY, L. S. A formação social da mente. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1991.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Paula Bernardes de Morais, Laurita Christina Bonfim Santos, Lucimar Venâncio Amaral, Luiz Edgard Bueno Filho, Emanuella Silveira Vasconcelos (Autor/in)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.